Fallond invest history
« Anatomy of a pullback »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Dec 6, 2009, 6:19am



Untitled Document

Home | Gold Patrons | Daily breakouts | Message board | Stockcharts public list | Online chat | Model portfolio | Stock Scan | Contact me

Google

Fallond invest history :: General :: Market opinion :: Anatomy of a pullback
   [Search This Thread][Reply] [Send Topic To Friend] [Print]
 AuthorTopic: Anatomy of a pullback (Read 1,177 times)
DJF
Administrator
*****
member is offline





Joined: Jan 2004
Gender: Male
Posts: 973
 Anatomy of a pullback
« Thread Started on Mar 24, 2004, 8:39pm »
[Quote]

[image]

[image]

[image]

[image]
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
DJF
Administrator
*****
member is offline





Joined: Jan 2004
Gender: Male
Posts: 973
 Re: Anatomy of a pullback
« Reply #1 on Mar 24, 2004, 8:46pm »
[Quote]

[image]

[image]

[image]

[image]
« Last Edit: Mar 24, 2004, 9:19pm by DJF »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
DJF
Administrator
*****
member is offline





Joined: Jan 2004
Gender: Male
Posts: 973
 Re: Anatomy of a pullback
« Reply #2 on Mar 24, 2004, 10:03pm »
[Quote]

Comparing the current decline to a pullback - similar to the one marked this time last year.

  • Current decline is well above fib retracements - it would take another 100 points to bring it the 38% retracement and a further 300 points+ to take it down to the 62% retracement. Last years decline eroded 62% of the prior advance. On a % loss basis, the current move down is no where near a crash
  • The volume in the current move has been steadily declining - there has been no fear sell off typical in a crash. A similar volume trend was observed in last years consolidation. The important feature in both a crash and consolidation decline is the huge increase in volume as prices retest prior lows - differentiating the pattern from a continuation in the downtrend
  • Both Dec-Mar 2003 and Jan-Apr2004(?) consolidations are marked by well defined downward channels. Based on this alone - the current decline should put a low in at 1,897 as per the second touch point of the lower channel which marked the first half of the double bottom last year. Look for a retest of this low in April. In 2003, the first half of the double bottom was marked by a crossover in the MACD trigger line of the NASDAQ and the secondary indicator $NAA50. Watch for this again. Last year, the MACD of the $NAA50 crossed above -100, this year it is close to -200. In the NASDAQ, last year the MACD crossed off lows of -25, this year it is closer to -35.
  • Last year, the $NAA50 fell from highs of 1,227 (827 pts 67%) to from a double bottom at 350. This year, the $NAA50 has fallen from 1,777 and is still declining at 630 (1,147 pts 65%)
  • Last year, the $BPCOMPQ declined from highs of 49 down to 35 (14 pts 29%). This year, the indicator has declined from highs of 77 to 59 and is still falling (18 pts 26%)
  • Last year the $NASI declined from highs of 258 to lows of -664 (922 point drop). This year, the $NASI has declined from 623 to -392 and is still falling (1,015 point drop)
  • The real question here is not if the market will bounce, but when the market bounces will it form a market double top, or, extend into a lengthy rally - potentially to 2,800 {the latter is *highly* unlikely - but, if you measure the distance of the last run and add it to the lows of the current consolidation that is the price target you get. In addition, check the chart below - we have test 2,160 peak resistance from spring 2001 but what about that peak of 2,772 from Christmas 2000???}

    http://stockcharts.com/charts/historical/nasdaq1986.html
« Last Edit: Mar 24, 2004, 10:11pm by DJF »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
DJF
Administrator
*****
member is offline





Joined: Jan 2004
Gender: Male
Posts: 973
 Step 2 begins
« Reply #3 on Mar 25, 2004, 4:42pm »
[Quote]

Step 1 was yesterday - the first half of the double bottom is in. Now for move to 1,988-2,000 before weakness takes prices back to 1,896. Watch the volume when the market gets close to 1,900. If volume expands - go long. Watch for MACD trigger line crossover in tech indices and $NAA50. Step 2 will likely complete in mid- to late April - this will be the time to buy.

DD as always,
DJF
« Last Edit: Mar 25, 2004, 4:44pm by DJF »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
DJF
Administrator
*****
member is offline





Joined: Jan 2004
Gender: Male
Posts: 973
 Re: Anatomy of a pullback
« Reply #4 on Mar 31, 2004, 9:44pm »
[Quote]

We have exceeed step 2 expectations - but now the market is at a major crux; resistance from the 50-day SMA, the psychological 2,000 level, and Jan-Apr downward channel resistance will likely end the recent rally. Tomorrow's action is entirely dependent on the jobs data. But, if this data is bad, and the market (predicatble) sells on the news - watch how the secondary market indicators react. Why?
  • Ultimate Oscillator and slow stochs in the $NAA50 have breached long term bearish divergences from their January highs.
  • The $BPCOMPQ has crossed its 5-day EMA and its ultimate oscillator is in the process of forming its third (and final) fan line.
  • The MACD of the NASDAQ composite has confirmed its crossover - unlike previous tests of the declining channel line where the MACD trigger line rebounded southwards.
  • NASDAQ slow stochs are just shy of the mid-line, but have crept above former support (now resistance) - look for the blue hashed line in the Aug203-Apr2004 slow stoch chart to act as support
« Last Edit: Apr 9, 2004, 8:59pm by DJF »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
djf
New Member
*
member is offline





Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 0
 Apr 9th: Where now?
« Reply #5 on Apr 9, 2004, 4:26pm »
[Quote]

Jobs data enthusiasm looks to have worked its way out of the market and geopolitical concerns are back to the fore. The rapid ascent looks primed for a pullback.
  • Thursday's bearish black candlestick does not help the bulls (coming off stellar YHOO action, the market should have performed better).
  • Weekly chart shows a bearish evening star candlestick combo
  • Media commentary suggests bulls will be back in force in Monday, a contrarian indicator.


Technicals remain strong.
  • RSI and MACD trigger lines are at levels higher than when the market traded closer to 2,100.
  • Slow stochs [14,3] have crossed over, but remain above the 80 line.
Downside on Monday would change this picture - but as things stand - there is no sell signal here.

http://stockcharts.com/gallery?%24compq

The pullback will test the 50-day SMA (just as the March breakdown bounced back to test it - confirming the downside break, the April breakthrough needs to test it to confirm, or not to confirm, the new rally). A loss of the 50-day SMA would be a definite sell signal and return bulls to the sidelines until the pullback completes a likely test of near term lows at 1,896.

DD as always,
DJF

Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
DJF
Administrator
*****
member is offline





Joined: Jan 2004
Gender: Male
Posts: 973
 Re: Anatomy of a pullback
« Reply #6 on Apr 14, 2004, 10:36pm »
[Quote]

Downtrend to retest double bottom in play. Look for

  • Light volume - below the 60-day EMA, irrespective of up or down days
  • Potentially sharp retreats - but low volume is key, these shake weak hands, but not the institutions who are acquiring the shares. If volume increases to 20% above average - then we have institutional involvement
  • The double bottom will complete on a 1%+ gain on heavy volume (20% over average) with trigger line crossover in MACD, and an OBV line above the 20-day SMA. Slow stochs should rise - confirming the end of the double bottom once above the mid-line [50]
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
DJF
Administrator
*****
member is offline





Joined: Jan 2004
Gender: Male
Posts: 973
 Into step 3
« Reply #7 on Apr 20, 2004, 8:31pm »
[Quote]

Loss of step 2 congestion on heavier volume, now heading into step 3. Watch for

  • Bullish divergences in MACD, slow stochs, and ultimate oscillator technicals. Should occur in markets and their secondary indicators
  • Higher trading volume down to mid-March lows, but lower volume on moves beyond these lows. We are looking for accumulation by institutions as stocks become better value. New near term lows on light volume mark the last of the weak hands bailing, not fresh selling. Should volume decline into new lows, but pick up once fresh lows are made, you have controlled selling and a continuation of the downtrend
  • New breakouts as fresh leaders emerge - there are always sectors performing well in a downtrend - these are the sectors that will take the market out of its correction
  • Step 3 will complete on a heavy volume, bullish candlestick(s) ie. hammer/bullish piercing/or morning star, followed in 4-10 days by a second high volume, higher close day (as per Investors Business Daily rules).
  • Aggressive GTC orders can be peppered close to March lows and a few points below. Full positions in these stocks should be taken on confirmation of a rally off the double bottom. Run tight stops in these positions as these will be "catch a falling knife" plays - in case the double bottom should fail
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
DJF
Administrator
*****
member is offline





Joined: Jan 2004
Gender: Male
Posts: 973
 May 15th situation
« Reply #8 on May 17, 2004, 12:46am »
[Quote]

We have entered the bowels of the double bottom - but I am not convinced that what we see is indeed a double bottom. Why?

[1] Weekly NASDAQ chart looks very poorly - we have a channel breakdown for the bull rally started last year. This will soon be confirmed by a loss in the slow stoch median line. OBV and MACD are negative - supported by the huge distribution week that took the market to the rising support trendline (and eventually through it).

[image]

[2] Secondary indicators have all but negated their bullish trend, thereby 'reseting' the double bottom count. Prior bullish divergences have been negated.

The $NASI will likely lead the next rally. Look for a situation as occurred in Dec 2004; 5-day EMA crossover, soon followed by a break of the last near term high {hashed green line}. In the current situation this line is close to zero, over 600 points away from where the indicator sits now. For such an even we should look for a relief rally to form a new (lower) near term high, a fresh $NASI low, and then a break of this lower near term high to signal the next big rally. Such a scenario is unlikely to happen for another 3-4 weeks - too long for the current double bottom (in the NASDAQ) to succeed. Look for a break of March 2004 lows and the preperation of a new double bottom. In addition, watch for a break in the large bearish trendlines (of the $NASI) marked in the MACD, Ultimate Oscialltor and Slow stochastics - a break of this will confirm a lengthy (2-3 month) bull rally.

[image]

The stocks above the 50-day SMA indicator is still in decline. Ultimate Oscillator has not mapped a bullish divergence, and the MACD may (or may not) do so. However, this indicator is oversold and should not extend much lower (but could move sideways for a while).

[image]

The BPCOMPQ indicator is the most bearish of the secondary indicators - next support is down at 35 (and 25 after that http://stockcharts.com/gallery?$BPCOMPQ). I see nothing to indicate a market bottom soon (no bullish divergences in MACD, Slow Stochs, or Ultimate Oscillator - or crossover in 5-day EMA) suggesting a break of March 2004 lows (in the NASDAQ) and a failure of the double bottom.

[image]

[3] In the NASDAQ, we have not seen high volume trading into the March 2004 low - instead we saw high volume selling down to this low and limp trading at the low - not at all like the action in March 2003. A break of the March 2004 low is a sell/short play at this point.

[image]

« Last Edit: May 17, 2004, 12:56am by DJF »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
DJF
Administrator
*****
member is offline





Joined: Jan 2004
Gender: Male
Posts: 973
 July 6th
« Reply #9 on Jul 6, 2004, 10:56pm »
[Quote]

Are we entering the first phase of a new double bottom? The Mar-May bottom doesn't look the right fit as outlined previously and below. There is a possibility of a triple bottom, this will depend on how the technicals and secondary indicators look as we approach 1,896.

[1] Weekly NASDAQ chart confirmed the end to the March 2003 rally on May 17th. OBV and MACD are in the red, although slow stochs did creep back above 50 (the mid-line). The latter marks a bull trap as the market failed to climb into its prior rising channel line - instead, bouncing neatly off resistance/former support, confirming weakness.

[image]

[2] Only one secondary indicator, $NAA50, succeeded in forming bullish divergence with respect to the March and May lows. However, the reaction high between the (bullish divergent) lows has yet to be breached - until this happens the bullish divergence is not confirmed. This does not look like it will happen and we should watch for new lows (and a fresh bullish divergence).


[image]

The $NASI has maintained decent strength, but failed to mark a double bottom because; [1] The bullish divergence between the $NASI Mar and May lows, and its MACD/Ultimate Oscillator/Slow stochs was weak, or non-existent, and [2] The $NASI did not climb over the last reaction high in April (as per $NAA50).

[image]


The BPCOMPQ has looked the weakest of the secondary indicators - failing to map any bullish divergence between March and May lows, and rallying in a sluggish trend. Support for this indicator lurks down at 35 and this looks to be the best place to watch for a bullish divergence. The BPCOMPQ measures the number of NASDAQ stocks showing buy signals as per point-n-figure charts. Without a strong BPCOMPQ whatever rally materialises will likely fail as fewer stocks carry the weight of the upward move.

[image]

[3] In the NASDAQ, we have not seen strong follow through volume to the upside. Only the last couple of weeks have seen above average trading, and two of those days were distribution days. We are in a second "step 3" of a move to retest prior lows, and likely to new lows. I have estimated where this low will be as marked by the trendline channels, and a measured move from June highs. The target is c1,824. When we reach it I will reassess the potential for a double bottom.

[image]

DD as always,
DJF

« Last Edit: Jul 6, 2004, 11:29pm by DJF »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
DJF
Administrator
*****
member is offline





Joined: Jan 2004
Gender: Male
Posts: 973
 Re: Anatomy of a pullback
« Reply #10 on Jul 20, 2004, 10:03pm »
[Quote]

[image]
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
WOW GOLD
Guest
 wow gold
« Reply #11 on Aug 26, 2008, 12:08am »
[Quote]

cvbner


wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
World of Warcraft gold
power leveling
powerleveling
power leveling
power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
power leveling
power leveling
power leveling
powerleveling
powerleveling
powerleveling
powerleveling
powerleveling
World of Warcraft power leveling
World of Warcraft power leveling
Rolex
rolex replica
replica rolex
Runescape Gold
RuneScape Money
Watches Rolex
Rolex Watches
rs gold
World of Warcraft power leveling
World of Warcraft power leveling
World of Warcraft power leveling
World of Warcraft power leveling
World of Warcraft power leveling
gold wow
gold wow
cheap wow gold
cheap wow gold
World of Warcraft gold
World of Warcraft gold
World of Warcraft gold
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
   [Search This Thread][Reply] [Send Topic To Friend] [Print]

Disclaimer: The information found on the Fallond Stock Picks Inc. websites (www.fallondpicks.com and www.fallond.proboards27.com) has been prepared without regard to any particular investor's investment objectives, financial situation, and needs. Accordingly, investors should not act on any information in this site without obtaining specific advice from their financial advisors and should not rely on information herein as the primary basis for their investment decisions. Information contained herein is based on data obtained from recognized statistical services, issuer reports or communications, or other sources, believed to be reliable. However, such information has not been verified by Fallond Stock Picks Inc. or any of its employees, Fallond Stock Picks Inc. makes no representations or warranties or takes any responsibility as to the accuracy of completeness of any recommendation or information contained herein. Fallond Stock Picks Inc. accepts no liability to the recipient whatsoever whether in contract, in tort, for negligence, or otherwise for any direct or consequential loss of any kind arising out of the use of the information provided on this website, or of the recipient relying on any such recommendation or information (except insofar as any statutory liability cannot be excluded). Any statements nonfactual in nature constitute only current opinions, which are subject to change without notice. Fallond Stock Picks Inc., or their respective affiliates or their officers, directors, analysts, or employees may have positions in securities referred to herein. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed shall constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation or an offer to buy any securities mentioned herein. This document does not purport to be a complete description of the securities market or developments to which reference is made. There may be instances when fundamental, technical, and quantitative opinions may not be in concert. There are risks inherent in all investments, which may make such investments unsuitable for certain persons. These include, for example, economic, political, currency exchange, rate fluctuations, and limited availability of information on international securities. Fallond Stock Picks Inc. and their affiliates make no representation that the companies which issue securities which are the subject of their research reports are subject to, or in compliance with certain informational reporting requirements imposed by the Securities Exchange act of 1934. Sales of securities or services covered in any report or on the web site may be made in only those jurisdictions where such securities or services and Fallond Stock Picks Inc. are qualified for solicitation. Fallond Stock Picks Inc. does not warrant, represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content, advertisements, or Third Party Sites and Content (as defined below) (collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from Fallondpicks.com and fallond.proboards27.com , nor the quality of any products, information, or other materials displayed, purchased, or obtained by you as a result of an advertisement or any other information or offer on or in connection with Fallond Stock Picks Inc. You acknowledge that any use of or reliance upon any Materials shall be at your sole risk. Fallond Stock Picks Inc. reserves the right, in its sole discretion and without any obligation, to make modifications to any portion of the Fallondpicks.com and fallond.proboards27.com web site or publications at any time. You acknowledge and agree that you bear responsibility for your own investment research and investment decisions, and that Fallond Stock Picks Inc. shall not be held liable by you or any others for any decision made or action taken by you or others based upon reliance on or use of information or materials obtained or accessed through use of Fallondpicks.com and fallond.proboards27.com . Prior to any transaction in securities, you should consult with a qualified professional securities or financial advisor.

RETURN TO TOP
Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free


This Board Hosted For FREE By ProBoards
Get Your Own Free Message Boards & Free Forums!